Beeple AI Artwork Sparks Ethics Debate
A new Beeple installation at the Madison Museum of Contemporary Art, which uses AI to analyze the museum's collection, has drawn over 600 signatures on an open letter criticizing the project's ethics.

A new artwork by Beeple scheduled for display at Wisconsin's Madison Museum of Contemporary Art (MMoCA) next month has sparked a local controversy. The dispute centers on the piece's use of artificial intelligence to analyze and transform images from the museum's permanent collection.
An open letter published in late August criticizes the ethics of the project. It has garnered more than 600 signatures, many from local residents. The letter argues the museum allowed Beeple to use images of artworks without permission from many of the artists or their representatives.
The piece, titled Diffuse Control (2025), is a stacked structure featuring screens displaying digital orbs. It previously appeared at the Shed in New York and the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. For the LACMA presentation, the museum allowed Beeple to use a rotating selection from its collection.
The open letter is sharply critical. It states the project is devoid of critical engagement and transforms artists' work into a consumerist spectacle to sell prints and boost Beeple's prestige.
MMoCA has stated the Wisconsin version will use works by artists including Francisco Goya, Rosa Bonheur, James McNeill Whistler, Gertrude Abercrombie, Utagawa Hiroshige, and Barbara Rossi. While many of these artists worked before the 20th century and their works are in the public domain, others produced copyrighted works more recently.
The letter argues that by volunteering work from their collection without the artist's consent MMoCA has overridden these artist's agency and compromised their legacies. It calls for art institutions to refrain from inputting collection art into AI models without the original artist's permission. The letter also demands the museum release a full list of all artworks used for the piece.
In the exhibition release, museum director Paul Baker Prindle positioned Diffuse Control within an artistic legacy that includes Vera Molnár and Harold Cohen, who used algorithms to create drawings. The open letter dismisses this as a deflection.
The letter's writers note their goal is not to fearmonger over computers in art. Yet several signatories labeled the piece anti-art in their comments. The concept references Refik Anadol's Unsupervised (2022), an AI piece that reimagined MoMA's collection and was widely criticized by art critics.
Beeple, the Wisconsin-born artist famous for a multi-million dollar NFT sale, did not respond for comment. He appeared to reference the controversy on social media. A museum spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.





